COVID-19 IN CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA PATIENTS – BRAZILIAN EXPERIENCE

Aims: To collect data about COVID-19 in CML patients from Brazilian centers and their outcomes. Methods: Observational, multicentric, ongoing register study. Hematologists from private and public CML reference centers from different regions of Brazil were invited to report their cases of COVID-19 in CML patients. Those centers are responsible for the care of approximately 3030 CML patients. Results: Between March 2020 and July 2021, 16 institutions contributed to this analysis, and reported 73 COVID-19 cases in CML patients (pts). Eight-five % were from the South and Southeast regions, 11% from Northeast. The median age was 50 years (22-79), with 33% of the pts older than 60. Male patients were predominant (60%). The median time of CML diagnosis was 9 years (0-29). Most of the pts were in first line therapy (57.5%), 27% in second line and 11% in third line. Current CML treatment at COVID-19 was: imatinib (46,5%), nilotinib (22%), dasatinib (16%), post-transplant (4%), asciminib (1%), ponatinib (1%), treatment-free remission (2%), no treatment (7%). COVID-19 grade: asymptomatic (4%), mild (66%), moderate (12%), severe/critical (16%). CML status at COVID: AP/BC (3%), CP (12,4%), hematologic response (11%), complete cytogenetic response (4%), MMR (34%), MR4.0 (8%), MR4.5 (27%). Eleven patients interrupted treatment temporarily during COVID. COVID-19 was confirmed by RT-PCR of oral and nasal swab collection (68%) or rapid/serologic test (32%). Comorbidities were present in 34 pts, most common were: hypertension (33%), diabetes (14%), chronic renal failure (4%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease/emphysema (5.5%), pulmonary hypertension (1). Hospitalization occurred in 30% of the cases, 18% in an intensive care unit, 8% with mechanical ventilation. Treatment received for COVID-19: antibiotics (31%), steroids (16%), chloroquine (5.5%), oseltamivir (4%);ivermectin (8%): heparin (3%). Sixty-nine patients recovered, 4 died from COVID-19 (5,4%): one 42 year old newly diagnosed male patient with high leukocytes counts and with a simultaneous bacterial infection, two 70-year old patients treated with imatinib, both in MR4.5, and one 31-year old male patient treated with nilotinib, after imatinib and dasatinib failure, with hematologic response. A fifth patient in the accelerated phase died 2 months after discharge, from disease progression and pulmonary infection. All cases occurred before vaccination. There was one case of re-infection, in a patient treated with imatinib. Discussion: Conclusions: the majority of COVID-19 cases in the CML population was mild, but there were 2 deaths of young patients with active disease and two deaths in elderly patients, one of them with comorbidities. The mortality in CML was lower than observed in other hematologic cancers.

Knowledge and use of personal protective equipment by nursing professionals during the Covid-19 pandemic

OBJECTIVE: To explore the knowledge and use of personal protective equipment by nursing professionals of Primary Health Care during the Covid-19 pandemic. METHOD: This is an exploratory study of a non-probabilistic sample developed in Basic Health Units in the city of Picos, Piaui, Brazil. Data were collected between June and August 2020, by phone call, following a semi-structured script, with responses recording and transcription. For material analysis, the software IRaMuTeQ was used for statistical textual analyses: Descending Hierarchical Classification, similarity analysis, and word cloud. RESULTS: From the corpus of 6,873 words and 832 lexical units, three categories were created: (1) motivations and barriers for use (20.9%);(2) handling of personal protective equipment (classes 5 and 4) with 25% and 21.6%, respectively, and (3) measures to protect users and health professionals (classes 3 and 5) with 17.6% and 14.9%. CONCLUSION: The nursing professionals interviewed demonstrated that they did not have sufficient knowledge for the proper use of the equipment, which could compromise their integrity and that of the patient as a subject who receives unsafe care.

Knowledge and use of personal protective equipment by nursing professionals during the Covid-19 pandemic

Objective: To explore the knowledge and use of personal protective equipment by nursing professionals of Primary Health Care during the Covid-19 pandemic. Method: This is an exploratory study of a non-probabilistic sample developed in Basic Health Units in the city of Picos, Piaui, Brazil. Data were collected between June and August 2020, by phone call, following a semi-structured script, with responses recording and transcription. For material analysis, the software IRaMuTeQ was used for statistical textual analyses: Descending Hierarchical Classification, similarity analysis, and word cloud. Results: From the corpus of 6,873 words and 832 lexical units, three categories were created: (1) motivations and barriers for use (20.9%);(2) handling of personal protective equipment (classes 5 and 4) with 25% and 21.6%, respectively, and (3) measures to protect users and health professionals (classes 3 and 5) with 17.6% and 14.9%. Conclusion: The nursing professionals interviewed demonstrated that they did not have sufficient knowledge for the proper use of the equipment, which could compromise their integrity and that of the patient as a subject who receives unsafe care.